1. evaluate object website:https://www.figma.com/proto/B96bzhPbenMmZNuHtdCPVdwn/TIM-158-Prototype?node-id=0%3A1&scaling=scale-down2:object report:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kG1fCVl0lShIo_XCWgbTihRpmkY43lpkHz86IotQjLwYou will perform a heuristic evaluation of another team’s high-fidelity prototype. You can find the team you are evaluating at this spreadsheet (you should evaluate the group below you in this spreadsheet). Your entire team will be assigned to evaluate the same team. However, you will need to do this step individually to create 4 independent evaluations.Using their tasks, task flows, interface design, screenshots, and high-fidelity prototype, you will apply Nielsen’s heuristics to the user interface. You should be able to get all of this information from their last assignment. Try to focus your evaluation more on giving helpful feedback on what you see rather than on missing features. If you are evaluating a team that is doing speech based interfaces, you may find it useful to instead use heuristics from this paper. Please use the heuristics and numbering scheme from the provided template (reorganized into three groups from Nielsen’s 10 heuristics). You will produce a report showing the problems in the interface using the provided template.Your report (Google Doc) will list each of the problems found in the following format: problem#. heuristic violated description of problem, rationale for why you think it violates the heuristic & suggestion to fixYour report will also summarize the number of violations found in each of the ten heuristic categories (make a table – see below) and give the total number of violations in the entire interface. Finally, your report should close with some overall recommendations you have for improving the user interface given what you read about their tasks and what you experienced in testing their prototype (1-2 paragraphs).
